Monday, February 24, 2014

According to the rubric, I didn't do well. Is it true?

What a question. Unfortunately, it is a question that is asked every day, in every school, by almost everyone. Alfie Kohn poses an interesting opinion to rubrics in his article, Trouble with Rubrics. In it, he discusses the reasons why he feels that a rubric may not be the best way to assess how well our students are learning.


In the article, Kohn writes of a conversation that he had with a high school English teacher who had just handed out the students' next assignment. During the conversation, the teacher states that because the students are presumably used to working from rubrics, they are "unable to function unless every required item is spelled out for them in a grid and assigned a point value." She adds that what is even worse is, “they do not have confidence in their thinking or writing skills and seem unwilling to really take risks.” Although I do agree with these ideas sometimes, I also feel that a rubric is a way that we can help to lay some of the groundwork for what we expect from our students. 


While we do highly value creativity and risk taking in music, it is also very important that our students understand the fundamentals so they are able to take those big risks. Without intonationtone qualitytempo, note accuracyarticulation, and phrasing, it is very hard for us as musicians to be successful in our risk taking endeavors. 


By creating a rubric that lists these expectations, we are simply reminding, especially our younger and more immature students, of what is needed to produce a successful sound on our instrument. 


I propose that we create a rubric that looks something like this:



Playing Test Rubric


1 = Fair    2 = Good    3 = Excellent    4 = Outstanding    5 = Superior
Scales:
Intonation                                                                      1  2  3  4  5
Student demonstrates ability to keep notes in tune with
each other
Tone Quality                                                                  1  2  3  4  5
Student produces a full, rich, open quality of sound
Tempo                                                                             1  2  3  4  5
Student maintains a steady beat throughout
Accuracy                                                                         1  2  3  4  5
Student plays written pitches accurately
Articulation                                                                    1  2  3  4  5
Student uses clear articulation. Notes are even and separated.
Follows all articulation markings in music
Phrasing                                                                          1  2  3  4  5
Student makes strong breathing choices. Refrains from taking
breaths in awkward/unusual places

Sight Reading I:
Intonation                                                                       1  2  3  4  5
Student demonstrates ability to keep notes in tune with
each other
Tone Quality                                                                  1  2  3  4  5
Student produces a full, rich, open quality of sound
Tempo                                                                             1  2  3  4  5
Student maintains a steady beat throughout
Accuracy                                                                         1  2  3  4  5
Student plays written pitches accurately
Articulation                                                                    1  2  3  4  5
Student uses clear articulation. Notes are even and separated.
Follows all articulation markings in music
Phrasing                                                                          1  2  3  4  5
Student makes strong breathing choices. Refrains from taking
breaths in awkward/unusual places



Sight Reading II:
Intonation                                                                      1  2  3  4  5
Student demonstrates ability to keep notes in tune with
each other
Tone Quality                                                                  1  2  3  4  5
Student produces a full, rich, open quality of sound
Tempo                                                                             1  2  3  4  5
Student maintains a steady beat throughout
Accuracy                                                                        1  2  3  4  5
Student plays written pitches accurately
Articulation                                                                    1  2  3  4  5
Student uses clear articulation. Notes are even and separated.
Follows all articulation markings in music
Phrasing                                                                         1  2  3  4  5
Student makes strong breathing choices. Refrains from taking
breaths in awkward/unusual places

Notes:




By creating a rubric like this, we can clearly define what is expected from our students on regular playing tests. We want our students to be excellent! That is our base line. If our students are playing at the level we expect them to play at, they will receive an excellent. For example, if a high school freshman is playing at the level where we expect a freshman who has been playing for 4 or 5 years to be, they will receive a rating of excellent (equivalent to an A). this means that if they average 3's across the board, they receive an A for that playing test. If, however, they are not where they need to be, or they are exceeding where they should be, we can score that accordingly as well and recognize what needs improvement or what the student is really successful at. After filling out the rubric, we can also provide specific notes to the individual on what they should truly be focusing on or what they did really well. 

I feel that a rubric like this is not really an issue because it is kindly reminding our students what they should be focusing on each and every day of a standard rehearsal or practicing block. Yes, it still does tell the student whether or not they are doing well, but it also shows them that with improvement, they can truly excel. 

7 comments:

  1. Jesse - why two sight reading examples?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Could you make a checklist instead?

    My thought is always where do I put Miles Davis on this rubric. Would he listen to me or get any value?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Chris - I suggest 2 sight reading examples because it gives the students a better opportunity to show what they are capable of. By providing one in duple meter and one in triple, it gives them a chance to show what they excel in.

    Brandt - I'm not sure how I would go about creating a checklist. I feel that it wouldn't be able to show a student what they need to improve upon as much as a scale does. Would you be able to help me come up with something along that line?

    As far as where I would put Miles Davis, I feel that I would be able to apply this rubric to him. Regardless of whether or not he was just starting out or already famous, everyone needs to look back at one point or another and reflect on their playing that day. I feel that reflecting on a list could help him realize what he could improve upon, even if they are minute details. Personally, I run through a mental list every time I am through practicing. When I practice, I will either record myself and listen after to see what I could improve upon or mentally recount what I worked on and what could use improving.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If students are playing at exactly the level you expect them to be playing at, why would they try to advance beyond that if they're already getting all 5's. How do you instruct them how to go beyond their level if they already have a perfect score?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If students are playing at the level I expect them to play at, they score a 3. A 3 across the board = an "A". The 4's and 5's are essentially extra credit for those who seek to attain it. It is my job to excite them and have them want to reach that point.

      Delete
  5. Interesting rubric, Jesse. Now let's say I wanted to use your rubric and use it for assessing sight-singing just because I had a bad experience in college that I want to prepare my students for it as much as I can. How could I adjust this? Would you think it would be the same way you would assess sight-reading?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it could be used for sight-singing as well. Depending on what key the sight singing is in, you could theoretically use the scale portion as a "heads up" and have them sing a short excerpt of a song that they already know in the key of what the sight singing is in. That way, especially starting off, they have a firm footing on what the key is. Slowly you could ween them off of it I think and replace it with something else that needs improving if you chose to.

      As far as the sight singing portion goes...I think you could theoretically leave it in the same format. Keep them both in the same key as the "scales" portion so they have a strong understanding of tonic to start out and. Have one that is in a duple meter and one that is in a triple meter. This should help you to see where they struggle as well as where they are excelling.

      Delete